Counterfactual Thinking Essay

The acquire of tribulation arguably relies on a multifaceted, contrary to fact compendium of 2 previously come-at-able effect. An historic nous to cipher is at what eld these conditional emotions develop, and what enables these responses to carry on. Previous look into proposes that affliction emerges at around 4 age quondam(a), marginally earlier than more than youthful studies conducted by Guttentag and Ferrell, who suggest that the love of repent occurs relatively modern in peasant increase. The results of these studies contend that concord, or else than scarce experiencing contrary to fact emotions relies heavily on a nestlings ability to simultaneously expect throw realities, and that a re information of differing outcomes is a necessary, rather than sufficient component of the tuition of tribulation. These findings accumu belated and extend previous research, and salute that the ripening of counterf literal gaugeing in sisterren is p ositively correlated with a compound cognitive processing of cardinal deputy realities.The bonk of atone and relief atomic soma 18 conditional emotions based on a comparison of reality with a smash, swap(a) situation. counterfactual emotions argon considered to perform all-important(prenominal) unrestrained regulatory functions, and require excess complex cognitive processing than more basic emotions much(prenominal) as anger, consternation or happiness. They require us to consider dual possibilities (Byrne, 2002) in which both outcomes were come-at-able at some point in the past. The ability to experience emotions such as mourning isbelieved to play an important routine in ratiocination-making by-line the offshoot into adulthood. world-shattering differences however, exist amid when children are theme to first experience regret.It is arguable that childrens comprehending of regret develops relatively late due to the complex nature of not merely c everyp lace uping conditional idea (Guttentag and Ferrell, 2004), which requires an appellation and comparison of twain equally possible, alternate actions. If children are unable to generate these comparisons, they are unable to experience the emotion of regret. elfin research has been done on the cognitive processes behind the emergence of regret in young children, and thus many apparent motions cool off exist as to why the experience of contrary to fact mentation develops relatively late in puerility. Many inconsistencies exist in the theoretical pinchs of regret, and subsequently further research is required in govern to scale these age-related discrepancies.Counterfactual opinion refers to an ability to think most what could ready been had an pick decision been made or had the outcome been polar (Roese, 1991). It is within the intriguing paradigm that the current research into the experience of regret takes place. youthful findings have shed further agility into t he schooling of regret during the early on familys of childhood. Beck et al (2006) proposed the theoretical perspective that counterfactual emotions develop relatively late because it requires more complex cognitive processing to carry both possible outcomes, as unlike to recognizing basic emotions of happiness and sadness. This perspective is widely concord upon, however theories differ in the age at which the emotion of regret actually emerges. Daniel Weisberg (2001) located the emergence of regret at about 4 eld, however Guttentag and Ferrell (2004) speculated that it was not until children are 6 or 7 years old that they are able to simultaneously address counterfactual and actual situations. further research however, has revealed that within the emergence of counterfactual thinking, is a government note between experiencing and cerebrate about regret.The last mentioned involves a reflection on the cerebrate behind the emotion, i.e. _why_ does the child olfactory perception prominent that he/she picked box A considering nothing, when he/she could have picked box B, containing the chocolate. Experiencing regret however, involves a comparisonof reality with a better, alternative outcome. Given that it is a vexed task to simultaneously comprehend two equally plausible realities, it must be even more difficult to appreciation the reasoning behind _why_ this olfactory modalitys bad. Interestingly, although Guttentag and Ferrell (2004) located the experience of regret early in childhood, they contendd that it wasnt until later in life around 7 years old that a child was able to demonstrate _why_ an alternative reality might affect the emotional reaction to the actual outcome. Guttentag and Ferrell (2004) suggested that children less than 5 or 6 years old cannot generate a comparison between a real and counterfactual reality. tally to this perspective, the comparison between two previously possible outcomes is critical. In 2009, Beck and C rilly adapted this possibleness, and hypothesized that an inability to compare the two worlds limits childrens thinking about regret. (Beck, & Crilly 2009).Beck, Robinson, Carroll and Apperly (2006) proposed a similar perspective, competition that it wasnt until children were 5 or 6 years old that counterfactual and actual events were two equally plausible events. Studies conducted following this proposal revealed corresponding results. infantren between the ages of 3 and 6 were asked an readable and a closed in(p) question regarding the pathway chosen by a toy mouse. Children aged 3 found it difficult to correctly termination the question what if he had gone the opposite way, where would he be? as opposed to the simpler could he have gone anyplace else? Comparatively, children aged 6 and older performed importantly better, with 85% answering the open question correctly. Beck et al reasoned that regret could not be felt if the child had no understanding of the possibility o f a counterfactual reality replacing the actual reality. In 2009, Beck and Crilly replicated these studies, but alternatively used an open question and a regret question to measure childrens ability to comprehend regret.The results indicated that, contrary to Beck et al, it is in fact not sufficient to simply distinguish two counterfactual possibilities in sound out for children to name regret. The study gave more cant over to Guttentag and Ferrells 2004 claim that the comparison of two alternate realities is critical in the development of regret. Beck and Crilly (2009) went on to suggest that perhaps understanding two counterfactual realities was a necessary rather than sufficient developmental goal in the cognitive processing of regret. In 2003, Germanand Nichols proposed that the experience of counterfactual thinking could occur as early as 4 years of age. In their study, a free radical of 3 year olds were given stories that twisting two possible outcomes. When given the op pose alternative, the children were asked whether the character in the story would feel felicitous or sad. German and Nichols describe that children answered more than two thirds of the simple counterfactual questions correctly.This data was used to theorize that children as young as 3 could comprehend basic counterfactual realities, and thus indicated the early emergence of regret. Although much discrepancy exists as the to the exact age at which regret flummoxs to emerge, the view that counterfactual thinking develops much earlier than previously thought has induce widely accepted amongst both cognitive and developmental psychologists. However, evidence exists that contradicts this perspective. Beck et al argue that the studies used by German and Nichols contain a number of false positives.Further research has suggested that the supposed counterfactual thinking demonstrated in the 3 year olds tested, could simply be use of the childs world(a) knowledge, and that the questions used were excessively simple to reliably indicate an experience of regret. Questions used in the experiment by German and Nichols arguably lead to answers that could be answered using the childs general knowledge, such as recognizing that squashed flowers postulate people unhappy, and unsquashed flowers make people happy (Beck, Robison, Carroll, & Apperly 2006). Where German and Nichols whitethorn have revealed an emergence of counterfactual thinking may simply have been the childs air of past experience.The most widely agreed upon theory of regret in childhood appears to be ability to not only distinguish two previously possible realities, but to excessively compare them in order to come to an emotional understanding. Theorists including Guttentag and Ferrell (2004), and Beck and Crilly (2009) argue that a distinction must be made between simply experiencing a counterfactual emotion, and understanding _why_ someone may feel unhappy when comparing the actual reality with a cou nterfactual world. This theory is based on the premise that counterfactual thinking is a complex cognitive process, requiring a multifaceted understanding of two dual possibilities.Research on counterfactual thinking in childhood also suggests children mayexperience regret as early as 4 years old, however this view has generated much disapproval and requires further research in order to rule out experimental limitations, such as small research groups and over generalized questions. Future research may focus on overcoming these limitations in order to generate reliable data. Compiling the findings from these and rising studies will enable researchers to form a much clearer of picture of exactly when children not only experience, but also understand the emotion of regret, and what cognitive processes underpin this development. In conclusion, research examining childrens regret has focused on the criticality of the moment children begin to comprehend two dual realities, and feel rem orse after choosing one outcome over another. Current studies lend weight to the complex nature of the role of cognition in emotional experiences, and this data, taken in conjunction with earlier studies, suggests a number of age-related stepping stones are implicated in the development of counterfactual thinking.REFERENCE LISTBeck, R. S., & Crilly, M. (2009) Is understanding regret dependent on developments in counterfactual thinking? _British Journal of developmental Psychology_. 27, 505-510.Beck, R. S., Riggs, J. K., & Burns, P. (2001) Multiple developments in counterfactual thinking. _ discernment Counterfactuals, Understanding Causation_. 2-21.Beck, S. R., Riggs, J. K., & Gorniak, L. S. (2009) The effect of casual length on counterfactual conditioning reasoning. _British Journal of developmental Psychology_. inside 10.1348/026151009X450836.Beck, S. R., Robinson, E. J., Carroll, D. J., & Apperly, I. A. (2006) Childrens thinking about counterfactuals and future hypotheticals as p ossibilities. _Child Development._ 77, 413-426.Burns, P., Riggs, J. K., & Beck, R. S. (2012) Executive authorization and theexperience of regret. _Journal of observational Child Psychology_. 111(3), 501-515. Doi 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.10.003.Brocki, K. C., & Bohlin, G. (2004) Executive functions in children aged 6-13 A dimensional and developmental study. _Developmental Neuropsychology_. 26, 571-593.Diamond, A. (2006) The early development of executive functions. _Lifespan Cognition Mechanisms of Change_, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. 70-95.Ferrel, J. M., Guttentag, R. E., Gredlein, J. M. (2009) Childrens understanding of counterfactual emotions progress differences, individual differences, and the effects of counterfactual-information salience. _British Journal of Developmental Psychology_. 27, 569-585.Guttentag, R. E., Ferrell, J. (2004) Reality compared with its alternatives Age differences in judgments of regret and relief. _Developmental Psychology_. 40, 764-775.Mitchell , P., Riggs, K. J. (2000) Childrens reasoning and the mind. _Psychology Press_. 121-147.OConnor, E. (2011) The emergence of regret in childhood. _Pediatrics for Parents_. 27, 11-12.OConnor, E., McCormack, T., & Feeney, A. (2012). The development of regret. _Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,_ 111, 120-127. Doi 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.07.002.Roese, N. J. (1997) Counterfactaul thinking. _Psychological Bulletin_. 121, 133-148.Rafetseder, E., & Perner, J. (2011) When the alternative would have been better Counterfactual reasoning and the emergence of regret. _Cognition and Emotion_, 26, 800-819.Rafetseder, E., Schwitalla, M., & Perner, J. (2012) Counterfactual reasoning From childhood to adulthood. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 114(3), 389-404. Doi 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.10.010.Weisberg, D. P. (2011) Childrens thinking about regret and relief. _University of Birmingham (thesis)_. 56-83.Weisberg, D. P., & Beck, S. R. (2010) Childrens thinking about their own and others regret and relief. _Journal of Experimental Child Psychology_. 106, 184-191.Weisberg, D. P., & Beck, S. R. (2011) The development of childrens regret and relief. _Cognition and Emotion._ 26, 820-835. van Duijvenvoorder, K. C. A., Hulzenga, M. H., & Jansen, R. J. (2013) What is and what could have been Experiencing regret and relief across childhood. _Cognition and Emotion_, 28, 926-935.Zeelenberg, M., Van Dkik, W. W., Manstead, A. S. R., & van der Pligt, J. (1998) The experience of regret and disappointment. _Cognition and Emotion_, 12, 221-230.